simulate the sun exploding universe sandbox 2

Simulate the sun exploding universe sandbox 2 how to#

It would be really cool if, depending on the size of the object, when it hits, the blast-wave engulfs the globe in fire and flame. Despite the massive mini-strikes across the world, we never see any other effects on the planet's surface. A visible blast-wave ripples across the planet, but quickly fades out. As of A13, when an asteroid/planet crashes into another celestial object, there is a massive hot-zone where the impact center is. It would be really amazing if there were things such as weather patterns occurring around the planet, especially fixed events. Even with the days zipping by, the clouds remain in the same position, there's no surface weather.

Simulate the sun exploding universe sandbox 2 how to#

I didn't know exactly how to word the idea, but the main basis is: While you see effects occur on Earth already, the surface is almost literally still. I really hope US2 becomes even bigger than the first.ġ. I loved the hell out of the first one, and since this is currently in Alpha, I was hoping I could hop on the idea boat and give some ideas to help with development. Simulating the Big Bang with Universe Sandbox would be very cool, but isn't as simple as a single exploding object, that expands outwards forever.I recently heard of Universe Sandbox 2 a couple days ago. The detection of the Cosmic microwave background radiation is strong evidence for the big bang:Īnd while we don't understand that dark matter is, observations of the motions of galaxies suggests that something is there and currently we call that something dark matter: There is lots of evidence for the big bang: And when scientists observe something that doesn't fit with their hypothesis then they change their hypothesis. The theories regarding the big bang or dark matter are based on the observable evidence. Scientists have no problem admitting that they don't know.Īnd to suggest that the big bang or dark matter is all speculation and not based on evidence is also unfair. Scientists are often the first to admit when they don't know the answer. I don't think your general claims about the scientific community are fair. Of course, this is still only theoretical at best, and is no better than the Big Bang 'theory.' Such a thing would only exist once in a universe's lifetime - at genesis, and can be comparable to a Big Bang. A being of pure energy being emitted out into space, condensing back into matter.

That is, in my opinion, what a 'White Hole' would be. The sheer amount of energy such a process would release can only be described as that - a sphere of pure energy being emitted back out into space.Īlso consider that energy and matter are interchangeable - An object traveling at (or beyond) the speed of light would 'become' energy.

I personally think that something happens to that black hole - something to destabilize it (Here lies the biggest hole in the theory - what could destabilize a singularity, let alone a black hole?), and release the mass.

I personally have my own theories about the Big Bang, to be slightly off-topic.ġ.) All galaxies have a supermassive black hole at its center.Ģ.) Galaxies are 'mobile' - Their centers move towards other galaxies.ģ.) The nature of black holes is to consume - mass approaching a black hole is added onto a black hole.įrom this, one can logically assume that all mass in the universe, after an unfathomable amount of time, will eventually fall into one, single black hole. The best thing you could do is, like Darvince said, cause a massive explosion and hope your computer doesn't die! I don't think such a thing could be possible with current computers, let alone US.